|
ANALYSIS Wal-Mart's Media Summit: Wal-Mart Must Target More Than Press
to Repair Image
PR Week - April 18 2005
By John N. Frank
In
an attempt to fix its negative profile, Wal-Mart is now courting
the media. But will the unions and groups attacking the retailer
buy into this strategy?
Wal-Mart's
first-ever media summit, held April 5 to 6, was its communications
coming-out party. The giant retailer showed itself to the world
through the 53 print journalists it gathered near its Bentonville,
AR, headquarters.
The
question now is whether the world - including community organizations
and labor unions that have long opposed Wal-Mart - will accept the
company's view of itself. Those who have worked on communications
issues for retailers and unions doubt that simply making its case
to the media will end Wal-Mart's image problems.
What
will be needed is sustained communications with all key stakeholder
groups and a willingness to change business practices in order to
find some common ground with groups that are key to the company's
continued business health.
Wal-Mart
already has shown some willingness to reach out. CEO Lee Scott,
for example, told reporters at the media days that he's willing
to talk to NGOs. And Wal-Mart executives met during the event with
a California group concerned about how Wal-Mart will develop a site
in its community. But more will be needed.
"Their
problems are going to get worse, not better," says Danny Feingold,
communications director for the Coalition for a Better Inglewood,
the California group that sent a delegation to the media days. "The
media is now looking for Wal-Mart stories. Wal-Mart is one of the
hottest stories in the country."
And
those stories aren't hard to find. The company is in the midst of
a major class-action suit alleging discrimination against female
employees. And even more embarrassing, The Wall Street Journal reported
immediately after the summit's conclusion that a former senior executive
previously charged with using company funds for personal purposes
might actually have been using them to buy information about anti-Wal-Mart
union activities. Thus far, Wal-Mart has denied the accusations.
Unions'
offensive
But
perhaps what Wal-Mart has most to fear are the negative PR efforts
being led by disgruntled unions and advocacy groups across the US.
"We're
working essentially to reform the business practices of this company,"
says Tracy Sefl, communications adviser to the Center for Community
and Corporate Ethics. The Washington, DC-based center was established
recently with the backing of unions and other groups with the express
purpose of getting Wal-Mart to change how it operates, Sefl explains.
"We believe by fighting this battle on multiple fronts there's
a greater chance of success. We'll be doing this swiftly and aggressively."
The
United Food and Commercial Workers union (UFCW) has also announced
a new anti-Wal-Mart campaign dubbed "Wake-up Wal-Mart."
"Traditional
organizing campaigns are too limited for a greedy, global company
that is willing to cut its nose to spite its face rather than do
the right thing and stand up for people," said Paul Blank,
who is coordinating the UFCW campaign, in announcing the effort.
"Those
unions won't go away, no matter how many public statements Wal-Mart
makes," says Eric Yaverbaum, president of Jericho Communications
in New York. "At day's end, it's not what Wal-Mart says that
will matter, it's what it does. You don't say, 'We're good'; you
show you're good."
Wal-Mart's
image problems won't abate until it can make some peace with unions
and demonstrate that it is a good place to work, Yaverbaum says.
But
that's what other people think. In two days of speeches and exchanges
with reporters, senior management made clear what it thinks about
how the press portrays Wal-Mart.
"I
think I read a headline [like] 'Wal-Mart Prices Come at Too High
a Cost" almost every day," CEO Lee Scott said to the media
gathering. "That and 'Is Wal-Mart Good for America?' I'd suggest
that a better headline may be 'Wal-Mart is Great for America.'"
Wal-Mart helps the country by offering lower prices, he says, saving
consumers $100 billion a year. It also pays wages and benefits that
are competitive in the retail sector, he adds.
"Some
well-meaning critics contend that Wal-Mart should be setting the
pace for wages and benefits for the entire economy, just as a unionized
General Motors was said to have done in the post-war period,"
Scott said. "The fact is that retailing doesn't perform that
same function in the economy as GM does or did."
But
few think that argument will sway unions or community groups. "Invest
in communities and employees, not PR," Feingold says in response.
"You do not have an image problem, you have a reality problem."
Wal-Mart's
response
Scott
left no doubt about how Wal-Mart views unions. "Union leadership,
which is watching membership and dues shrink in just about every
industry, has declared war against Wal-Mart in hopes of either unionizing
our associates or making us go away," Scott said. That sort
of belligerent attitude toward unions won't help Wal-Mart change
its image, say observers.
"Why
don't they look at unions from a different angle?" asks Oliver
Schmidt, managing partner of C4CS, a crisis communications specialist
in Pittsburgh. Wal-Mart has managed to keep unions out even as it's
grown to be the world's largest retailer. But that doesn't mean
it can continue to ignore unions, particularly as it moves more
aggressively into union strongholds in the Midwest and Northeast.
Omitting such a major stakeholder group from its communications
efforts will only serve to fuel increased union anti-Wal-Mart efforts,
Schmidt says.
Edd
Snyder, executive director, corporate communications, at GM, has
extensive labor relations experience. Commenting on how best to
deal with unions in general, Snyder says, "You must find some
common ground. The idea is to bridge [differences] and talk and
be in constant communication with the other organization. Find common
threads."
The
US auto industry took decades to achieve a relative state of calm
with its unions, but the speed of news and communications in general
has changed so much in recent years that "any union and any
company can develop a common ground much more quickly now than in
the olden days," Snyder contends.
Wal-Mart
addressed its labor issues by talking about contented workers. Scott
referred in his speech to one unnamed employee who was able to deal
with $676,500 in medical expenses by paying only $2,100 in out-of-pocket
expenses, thanks to Wal-Mart's health insurance plan.
Mona
Williams, VP, communications, says Wal-Mart will seek to "engage"
more employees to tell their stories, but wouldn't elaborate on
what that will mean. A while ago, it created a website, Walmartfacts.com,
on which it is posting employee comments and vignettes.
It's
also unclear how Wal-Mart will address the question of its social
responsibility in the communities where it operates. The Inglewood,
CA, group is asking Wal-Mart to sign a community benefits agreement
that will guarantee certain wages, health insurance, and other benefits
for workers should it build a store there. It's asked other developers
to do the same.
"Communities
like Inglewood expect to have a say about what [Wal-Mart does] in
our community," says Daniel Tabor, a member of the coalition
and a former Inglewood city councilman. Wal-Mart angered Inglewood
residents last year by trying to get a new store approved through
a voter referendum rather than seeking city approval. Voters rejected
the Wal-Mart measure.
Williams
says the company will need time before discussing its communications
strategy on the social responsibility front.
That's
understandable given what a major change of strategy the recent
media conference represents for Wal-Mart.
Wal-Mart's
success as a retailer demonstrates it should be able to succeed
as a communicator, as well, says Fred Marx, a partner with extensive
retail experience at Marx Layne, a PR firm in Farmington Hills,
MI. "[Wal-Mart has] an uncanny ability to figure out what it's
going to take" to be successful, Marx notes.
Others
aren't so sure, but media, unions, and community groups are all
paying attention now to find out.
|