Los Angeles' airport agency is prepared to spend upward of $100 million
under a groundbreaking agreement that would ensure neighborhoods most
harmed by LAX operations receive specific benefits from airport modernization,
officials said Wednesday.
The legally binding Community Benefits Agreement would be the first
of its kind in the nation linked to a public works project and could
set a precedent for other cities to follow, according to representatives
from the coalition that is negotiating the pact with Los Angeles World
Airports, which operates LAX.
The agreement would provide Lennox, Inglewood and southwest Los Angeles
with benefits that could include soundproofing, new and accelerated
environmental and health programs and local hiring guarantees.
Airport agency officials estimate the programs will cost from tens
of millions to hundreds of millions of dollars, said Jim Ritchie, LAWA's
deputy executive director of long- range planning and the airport agency's
negotiator.
"The communities that are the most impacted are, in fact, the
poorest communities, the most minority communities, and receive fewer
benefits from airport business," said Bruce McDaniel, superintendent
of the Lennox School District, which sits directly under arrival routes
used by hundreds of low-flying planes a day. "They should receive
benefits to mitigate the fact that the airport creates problems to their
daily lives."
The proposed agreement, however, could face opposition from the airline
industry, which would end up funding the programs through airplane ticket
taxes.
"Community support is important, but this proposal strikes me
as a little off-center," said Doug Wills, vice president of communications
for the Air Transport Association, a powerful national airline lobbying
group.
"In general, U.S. airlines would oppose any ... measures that
would transfer federal tax dollars dedicated for airports away from
actual airport improvements."
A group of school districts, labor unions and community and environmental
organizations -- which calls itself the LAX Coalition for Economic,
Environmental & Educational Justice -- has been negotiating the
pact with the airport agency for the past three months.
Negotiators hope to ship an agreement to the Board of Airport Commissioners
in August for approval, said Maria Loya, policy director for the Los
Angeles Alliance for a New Economy, which is one of the coalition members.
Mayor James Hahn urged airport officials to negotiate with the coalition,
said Phil Depoian, an LAX deputy director who also serves as Hahn's
airport liaison.
The city's airport and planning commissions this week approved a compromise
version of Hahn's $9 billion LAX modernization plan.
Numerous possible mitigation measures are included in the plan's environmental
impact report.
But the proposed benefits agreement would require specific measures
favored by local communities, said Jerilyn Lopez Mendoza, policy director
of the Environmental Justice Project, the Los Angeles arm of the national
Environmental Defense organization.
"That's basically our interest -- not just ensuring that any mitigations
happen but that they are the ones the community decides is important,"
Mendoza said.
Community benefit agreements have been reached in recent years on several
privately funded developments in Los Angeles, including the downtown
Staples Center.
And the city of New York passed a law requiring that clean-burning
construction equipment be used during the rebuilding of the World Trade
Center complex, Mendoza said.
But Mendoza and Loya said they believe the proposed agreement over
LAX modernization would be the first such pact on a public works project.
"L.A.'s been setting the tone for the rest of the country,"
Mendoza said.
The scope of the LAX modernization agreement, however, will be limited
by federal regulations requiring that airport-generated revenue be spent
on airport-related projects.
The Federal Aviation Administration rejected a proposal that LAX pay
for tutors for children whose learning has been harmed by aircraft noise,
McDaniel said.
But airport and coalition representatives said separately that they're
committed to seeing how far they can stretch federal rules.
"We're going to push the envelope and explore areas that maybe
in the past were closed to us," said Ritchie, who directed the
development of LAX modernization plans pushed by Hahn and his predecessor,
Richard Riordan.
For example, the airport may try to win federal approval to better
soundproof Lennox schools that it previously paid to soundproof two
decades ago, Ritchie said.
Other projects could include:
Accelerated retrofitting of airplane gates so that aircraft
waiting to be loaded and unloaded can be powered electrically rather
than having to run their engines, which spews pollution into the air.
Quicker conversion of ground support equipment to natural gas.
A consolidated shuttle system for airport-area parking lots
and hotels.
A study to determine which airborne toxins are due directly
to airport operations.
Local hiring opportunities and ongoing living wage jobs.